Mehr reviewed;

Mehr reviewed; Why do recent attacks by the resistance help strengthen the deterrence of the country in the region? 🔺 The operational dynamics of the resistance axis in recent battles have proven the truth that the balance of power in the region is based on the ability to impose strategic costs and erode the vital infrastructure of the opponent. 🔺 The simultaneous actions of Ansarallah in Yemen to blockade the oil routes of Bab-el-Mandeb, Iran's preemptive and deterrent attacks on key US positions in Jordan, and the intelligent control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz indicate that the resistance discourse has managed to activate geography as an effective geopolitical and economic weapon against American military hegemony. 🔺 Maintaining and continuing these field achievements after the flames of war subside requires heightened vigilance and a transition to strengthening economic foundations and national resilience within the countries of the resistance axis, such as Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria, as comprehensive sanctions and the enemy's livelihood pressures act as the Achilles' heel of this front. 🔺 Ultimately, stabilizing this new balance of power and preventing regional countries from leaning towards alternative transit routes requires that Iran's military power and missile deterrence in the Strait of Hormuz and other waterways be combined with active region-oriented diplomacy and strong economic ties so that the resistance discourse can ensure its long-term sustainability in accordance with the local structures of each society.